Feb. 21, 2021. Since November we have been walking once a month as plastic pirates through this neighborhood, which we call our new home since September, and use tweezers, gloves and garbage bags to collect the rubbish that is carelessly thrown into nature by fellow citizens. Today, we were the forth time on the road as Plastic Pirates around the old Glanzstoff factory. We captured 19 kilograms in just under two hours of raid. Time to take a step back and contemplate.

I had imagined Austria differently. At least I remembered it differently. Clean. Neat. Close to nature. I was abroad for 20 years. Now I'm back in this country with my children and I'm disappointed and worried at the same time. Disappointed about the state of nature in St. Pölten and the surrounding area. Concerned about the apathy with which this condition is met and about the smoldering anger I see in conversations with native residents.

Austria has turned in relative terms and not taking into consideration countries places like UAE or Luxembourg into one of the top 5 global immigration nations after Australia and Sweden, but before Germany or the United States. In cities like STP one third of residents have a migration background. A clash of cultures is underway, which will exacerbate with population growth and climate crisis caused migration for the years to come. The waste we see in nature is a physical manifestation of this brewing tension.

I have been collecting rubbish for 10 years. It all started with a vacation in the Philippines on the island of Boracay, where I had to surf my kiteboard on a beach polluted by tourist sewage. No fun. At first there was just disappointment, but then the decision quickly came to have to contribute something myself. A few years later, the island was completely closed to tourism due to an ecological mega-disaster, but I had made the habit of collecting rubbish for one day of my vacation and thus giving something back to my host country.

For the past three years I've been hunting rubbish once a month, no matter where I am, and I think a lot about the future of work and education. My wife is still irritated, but the children like to be there when we run new routes. In St. Pölten, too, we wanted to get to know a new route on Sunday, because I had believed that three cleanings around the gloss fabric would be sufficient. In addition, shortly after our January mission, the municipal waste service thoroughly disposed of the rubbish along Herzogenburgerstrasse.

Unfortunately not. In fog and light rain we went our usual route and when we reached Traisenpark Süd, a local shopping center, our handcart was fully loaded with rubbish. It is worrying that more than 80% of our prey consists of new contamination, ie it was disposed of in nature between our last mission a month ago and this Sunday.

Dealing with rubbish is perhaps not a pleasant but incredibly formative process. On several levels. Physically, on a Plastic Pirates tour, I bend down at least 200 times and have completed a healthy workout in fresh air. Emotionally speaking, it feels good to free a piece of our planet from surface pollution - after such an activity dinner tastes better and I sink satisfied into the sofa, grateful for a day filled with purpose.

You also think about all kinds of things. What kind of rubbish is out there? Which people throw it away so carelessly? What's going on in their minds? What does the beaver that we finally got to see think when he's living among plastic trash? How can one counteract this human apathy and also aggression? What does it take to create more respect for public goods in a society?

We never get the time to move the old stock from the rest of the forest next to the mill river - my children now call it now just “the dump” - because nature fills with new rubbish in the four weeks between our operations. This new waste is made up of around 60% residual waste, 30% aluminum cans and 10% glass. It is noticeable that the majority of aluminum cans are energy drinks - these consumers cannot really be blamed, because they were too excited to notice the rubbish bins which are installed every 500 meters or so. A smaller part consists of beer cans. These consumers, in turn, usually no longer make it to the trash can because they are already heavily sedated. Mostly they cannot remember and are therefore difficult to be questioned about their motives.

Then there are a substantial number of cigarette packs. I didn't realize that so many people still smoke. With the cigarette butts around the benches, you could definitely fill another two big waste bags. This should be done at some point, because nota bene: one cigarette butt contaminates 40 liters of good drinking water. About a third of the residual waste comes from McDonalds. This company is currently advertising far beyond the boundaries of freedom of expression with “Touching allowed. Your handful of normality. ”Throwing away properly is also allowed and is part of normality.

After years in the automation industry, I am at least aware that our industrial companies produce packaging extremely efficient with robots and automated assembly lines. However, garbage that we throw into nature in a disorderly manner will still have to be collected by human hands in the coming years. There are no suitable machines for this yet. So if we don't want to run the risk of suffocating in our own rubbish, as shown in the Pixar film Wall-E, then we have to take appropriate measures now.

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation

These measures can quickly be traced back to the topic of motivation. Why do we behave as we would expect others to do? Why do we even behave in a certain way? Is it our own ideals and standards or is it the standards of others and society that lead us to do things or not to do them?

Modern people are self-sufficient and are no longer interested in what others think of them as long as they have found favor on facebook or instagram. Modern society withdraws more and more from the important questions. One lives plurality in every respect. Sexual behavior. Consumer behavior. Disposable Habits. Just do it.

The result is a disoriented youth, paralyzed teachers, apathetic parents and cultural weakness. What does it actually mean to be from here? To be entitled to dispose one's garbage in nature or to take responsibility for this place and to free nature from garbage? How long does a form of coexistence work that does not establish basic behavioral norms and creates positive incentives to obey to them?

The renowned sinologist Oskar Weggel wrote in 1997 about a future with 12 billion people, cramped spaces and scarce raw materials: in such an environment the glorification of the individual must be as it has become established in modern philosophy - and in the western industrialized countries , appear as a “luxury creation” that is neither appropriate to human history as a whole nor to the prospects of a “post-European” age.

Classical Confucianism was a child of need - and as such gave answers to the question of how distribution struggles can be resolved bloodlessly and how forms of close proximity can be designed as conflict-free as possible. In a sign of diminishing options and increasing constriction, it could once again prove to be a refuge and advisor! Globalization would then unfold the other way around, namely from east to west!

A comparison with the city-state of Singapore, in which about as many people live as in Austria, comes to mind. Since 1968, citizens have been educated there to keep their land clean, not only with gentle instructions, but with hefty fines of at least 300 Singapore dollars. Over 56,000 people are registered as voluntary garbage collectors and support the government in its efforts to make Singapore a model country. Retirees in particular like to meet in groups and roam the area like the raping Huns.

In Singapore, both forms of motivation have worked together to improve the environmental situation. On the one hand, high fines are an extrinsic motivation to dispose of nothing wildly, on the other hand, the groups that like to meet repeatedly to collect rubbish are an opportunity to socialize and do meaningful activity instead of being lonely at Netflix and McDonalds at home.

It is obvious that something must be done. An employee of the municipal gardening company recently told us at the Viehofner See that he and a colleague of us are exclusively occupied with collecting rubbish. Every 5-10 days they go around the lake in winter and daily in summer. The loading area of ​​her emergency vehicle is always full. The garbage has doubled since Corona because people are outside a lot more. How would the throw-away behavior change if surveillance cameras are set up along the Mühlbach or at the parking lots at Viehofner See and littering is punished with fines?

With Plastic Pirates, a format that we developed three years ago in Shanghai, we are trying the path of intrinsic motivation and especially invite children and families to take on “stewardship” for a small part of our planet in a playful way. Our participants are made up in a warlike manner and receive an eye patch with which it is all the more difficult to operate the gripper in such a way that something is actually transported into the common garbage bags.

Green Steps combines best practices from alternative pedagogy and the latest learning psychology to improve the learning outcome and experience of the participants. Children form small pirate crews and fill garbage bags that are weighed on electronic scales. In an opening group, children learn about the different types of rubbish in general and plastic in particular.

We use storytelling and object manipulation as a method to strengthen long-term memory and establish healthy habits. The contents of all garbage bags are sorted together and each child takes an object and tells a story in a reflection circle about how it ended up in nature. Events like Plastic Pirates are organized in neighborhoods with a high percentage of residents with a migrant background. Children learn in a playful way to respect the environment and to have fun as a group.

Interested? Take a look at our event platform and become a pirate! Crew recruiting every third Sunday of the month.

[1]Knut Wimberger, The Future of Work and What We Can Do Now
[2]Oskar Weggel, China im Aufbruch: Konfuzianismus und politische Zukunft
[3]https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20181025-the-cost-of-keeping-singapore-squeaky-clean

Everybody talks these days about the economic cost of the lockdown. The numbers for small, but relatively wealthy Austria are 2 billion Euro / day. Whatever. Nobody talks about the ecological cost of operating our economies as if there was no climate crisis. I am amazed by how media controls our minds and grateful for almost not following any. One is sucked into this sewer of ignorance too easily.

Ecologist Jean Marc Jancovici explained during the first lockdown in 2020 that it takes such drastic lockdown measures for the next 30 years in order to conform with the Paris Climate Agreement, which aims at keeping global warming below 2 degrees Celcius.
 
Despite having conducted all the calculations and signed respective treaties, we do everything to keep our economies running. We rather purchase millions of masks, tests and vaccinations from the country where the virus erupted instead of producing regionally and spend at least EUR 12 million every week to test 1.1 million students twice a week, so that they can again sit classes in which they learn zero about how to deal with the situation ahead.
 
I am in the fifth month of returning to the society where I was born after having lived almost two decades abroad. Yesterday evening I watched for the first time since then local TV over ironing my shirts. A magazine called Thema reported on the implications of lifting the lockdown. Interestingly it interviewed only scientists who expressed great concern over the English and South African virus mutations and warned that removing the hard lockdown measures might cause a boomerang effect. Nobody discusses the etiology of this pandemic. Of course not. Science cannot afford to explain what cannot be measured.
 
Jancovici describes the problem our societies face in a simple way: "How do we get a job in a context where the economy is contracting, [...] ensuring everyone a form of optimism for the future?"  According to him, the stagnation of the energy production already at work makes our model obsolete and should inevitably culminate in an economic recession.  Economic recession is therefore considered by him as a fundamental reality we have to learn to deal with.
 
The "Shift Project" plans therefore to stop all public subsidies to certain industries like aviation.  According to Jean-Marc Jancovici, the Air France group, which benefited from an aid plan of 7 billion euros, can no longer maintain its pre-crisis strategy.  "There won't be as many planes flying," he concedes, lines are going to close and the number of flights will be reduced.  These strategic shifts must occur for him in all sectors: mobility, energy, housing.

If all these industries go into a permanent recession, we need to ask once again, how people will earn their livelihoods. Back in 2016 I conducted research on this question from a different starting point and initiated this blog under the title mingong = migrant worker: what will people do if their jobs are being made obsolete by machines and software? And what should children learn if they will not find job as their parents did?

I then wrote: Increasing automation and computerization, in particular the recent development in AI research and application will lead within the next two decades to a total collapse of our labor markets, in particular the tertiary sector. In 30 years from now, we will live in societies where most menial and skilled work is executed by robots and algorithms and people are either without job or self-employed. The ongoing Chinese robot revolution will play a prominent role in this development, because China will be for the first time in the industrial revolution’s history pitcher instead of catcher. The Chinese industrial robot revolution will catalyze and exponentially accelerate the AI revolution.

I came to the conclusion that a collapse of labor markets can only be resolved by a new redistribution of wealth and the gradual agreement on a new social contract. This new social contract will have a guaranteed basic income as its central pillar. The current widely held concept of an unconditional basic income should be changed to a basic income which is condition to life long learning and community service.

The Economist writes this week that there are clear pandemic winners, namely silicon valley and China Inc. Tech giants are the big COVID-19 winners. I am surprised at the speed with which my predictions manifest themselves. The pandemic acerbates the already by Thomas Piketty and other economists explained unequal wealth distribution and pressures decision makers into either giving up on humanity or moving forward with a conditional basic income, that is a basic income which is subject to a sustainable lifestyle. 

Follow up reading:

• Martin Ford: The Rise of the Robots – Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future
• National Development and Reform Commission Robotics Strategy: 机器人产业发展规划（2016-2020年）发布
• Switzerland put the unconditional guaranteed basic income as the planet’s first country to a referendum on June 5, 2016. Detailed information about the socio-economic implications can be found on the website of the organizers.
• Thomas Piketty: Capital in the 21st Century
• Myself: On Pandemics, Pigs and Our Children.

Daniel Goleman writes: In a system there are no side effects – just effects, anticipated or not. What we see as “side effects” simply reflects our flawed understanding of the system. In a complex system cause and effect may be more distant in time and space than we realize. Much of the time people attribute what happens to them to events close in time and space, when in reality it’s the result of the dynamics of the larger system within which they are embedded. [in Focus - The Driver of Excellence]

Teachers all over and beyond Europe suffer. Here they suffer more than in China, where teachers are used serve as the regime's executive arm. Here they are less experienced with following orders which change by the week. Teachers are miserable slaves in a system which they are ordained to keep in place in order to let adults go to office and purchase things they don't need. But what about the children they are asked to guide towards enlightenment and wisdom?

The cause and effect chain is as simple as this: scientists tell us that we live in the Anthropocene, i.e. the geological age which is defined by man's impact on the planet. It is without doubt how we educate our offspring what defines the next generations impact on the planet. That's not rocket science. Its common sense. However, we go at great length to maintain the status quo. We ask our children to wear masks in school all day. We ask them to bore themselves to death during online classes which are hardly interesting when experienced in the classroom.

What is it that we want to testify to ourselves? That we have seen the collapse coming but were incapable to react in time? That we rather conform to a failing system than have the courage to think about something new? I feel like we go through a new form of holocaust. Then we looked away and pretended that fellow human beings were slaughtered by a - in Erich Fromm words' - mechanistic culture. Now we look away and pretend not to see that our children are being spiritually and emotionally slaughtered in an industrial system which has become obsolete and needs to be abandoned for the sake of humanity's survival and evolution.

I am at my wit's end. In the last weeks i have talked to highly decorated members of the club of rome, the distinguished members of the austrian biodiversity council, we have submitted our idea to transform education to the austrian biodiversity conference, we have talked to sustainability investors, we have submitted two grant applications to the European Commission. nobody is ready to take a substantial leap of faith. nobody even sees what needs to be done despite it being so obvious. scientists have a tunnel vision which is limited by their research subjects. they have lost or never had interdisciplinary thought. business people rather continue to sell "green" products instead of igniting the practice of the wild.

until a few months ago i thought that the Chinese education system is radically different from Europe's. Covid-19 has shown that it is essentially the same. Instead of granting our children and their parents a well deserved winter break, a break which is in deep alignment with the rhythm of nature, a break which allows beast, man and land to rest and regenerate, a break which was an annual rule until the peak of the industrial revolution, instead of granting this break, we busy ourselves through the quietest of all times, force ourselves and our children to get up in the dark of the night and spend the same amount of hours in classes and offices as we do during the long days of summer.

why do not more people react to this insanity and call for a change?

The last quarter has started before Easter 2021. We will gradually offer a new curriculum. One which is outdoors instead of indoors. One which focuses on empathy and ecology instead of STEM subjects. One which teaches collaboration instead of competition. One which teaches love instead of fear. We shall not fear. Something much better is just around the corner.

The Covey Circles of Influence

Anxiety is a call to action so we need to respond by doing something. Stephen Covey’s CIA method can help break a problem down so it is less overwhelming. Covid-19 has put us in an unprecedented situation which causes great worry and anxiety.

Working from the outside in, categorise your worries into those which you can:

Accept – these concerns are outside of your control and influence. Try to let these go and focus on what you can influence and control.

Influence – be realistic about the concerns you can influence. Score your influence on a scale of 1-10 and any concern scoring lower than 5, move to ‘Accept’.

Control – direct your time and energy towards the elements that you can control. This will minimise feelings of overwhelm and frustration

Sunday, Dec 13, 2020. We have just completed our first event on the European continent: 13 kg of trash collected and much more waiting for our upcoming monthly clean ups. This is a small step with quite a big implication for us: Green Steps does officially operate in both China and Europe. Exactly one year ago, on Dec 13, 2019, we registered an NGO in Austria to tie our China activities closer to our European home countries. The local law stipulates that a non-profit organization only comes into being once it actually provides the services it was set up for. Up till now we were busy with legal issues, understanding the social welfare system, preparing ourselves for recruitment of local staff and above all networking with other organizations and government entities. Since today we do what we are supposed to: providing education in harmony with nature.
 
Join our next event on January 10th, 2pm or every 2nd Sunday of the month.

St. Poelten or short STP
 
It looked for many months like we would set up shop in the Berlin area, where we spent this year twice a few days as participants in a social impact accelerator financed by the Robert Bosch Foundation. We made friends in and with Berlin, but things unfolded differently. St. Poelten or short STP, the small provincial capital of lower Austria is as for now our European homebase. Lower Austria is to Austria – albeit on a different scale – what Hebei is to China: the province surrounds the nation’s capital. STP therefore looms in Vienna’s shadow like Shijiazhuang in Beijing’s.

In terms of transportation, infrastructure, access to nature and culture, STP compares better to Kunshan: it takes only 20’ to arrive by bullet train at Vienna’s main train station. Vienna gives to STP residents access to world class museums and music venues like the famous Golden Hall in a way Shanghai does to the many business which have chosen Kunshan for their operation. STP is removed from the hustle and bustle of larger cities. There are practically no traffic jams and almost everything can be reached on foot or by bike. While Kunshan is surrounded by the many lakes which are scattered between Shanghai and Suzhou, offering to its residents water sports and cycling as major pastime activities, STP is nestled at the intersection of four bioregions which invite to hiking and mountaineering in different landscapes.  
 
STP reminds us of China in yet another way: the city is full of construction sites, and yellow cranes make up an intrinsic part of the humble skyline. A friend from exitgreen, a local sustainability organization tells us that STP deals with similar problems like cities in the YRD: it has the highest surface sealing rate in all of Austria and grows due to its proximity to Vienna and convenient public transport connection faster than any other city in this small country. Dynamism brings both opportunity and risk as we know from China: things can change fast for the better or the worse.
 
Rapid growth of urban spaces usually causes not only surface sealing but also the loss of commons. While we notice surface sealing and the construction of buildings as a manifestation of economic growth in the material world, the loss of commons spreads invisibly like a deadly gas and literally suffocates communities. Many years ago, when I studied in law school, I wondered about the psychological impact of property rights on our societies. Liberal economist like the famous economist-historian Niall Ferguson argue that property rights are an essential ingredient to create a civilization. I now think that property rights will be identified in future as both: the cause for a civilization’s rise and fall.

Little Boxes

With the dissection of commons into small plots which belong exclusively to an individual or a corporation we destroy the integrity of the natural world and as such the possibility to connect to the planet. The more we retreat into the fake security of our own homes like fearful snails, the less we are able to connect to others and the planet. The capitalist property system creates a world of “little boxes” as political activist Malvina Reynolds sang in 1962.
 
A few years ago, Reynolds’ song was made a second time famous through the TV series Weeds, in which a suburban mother turns to dealing marijuana in order to maintain her privileged lifestyle after her husband dies. She finds out just how addicted her entire neighborhood already is. The TV series are a satire of suburban life but does also reflect how the property system creates a deprivation of shared space and thus community, which needs to be compensated with (drug) consumption.
 
We meanwhile know that our consumption habits are intrinsically related to our carbon footprint and therefore to climate change. Many try hard to live more sustainable lives, but we are caught up in the web of our societies which drive us into behavioral patterns of consumption and often unconscious compensation. The post WWII dream of the single-family home filled with appliances which make modern life enjoyable rests on the daily routine of commuting to the workplace and on the at least weekly routine of purchasing groceries in a supermarket or mall which is conveniently reached by car. We have given up self-reliance farming and completely and utterly rely on big retailers which dominate over the spectrum of our buyer decision.  
 

Little boxes on the hillside,
Little boxes made of ticky-tacky,
Little boxes on the hillside,
Little boxes, all the same.
There's a green one and a pink one
And a blue one and a yellow one
They're all made out of ticky-tacky,
And they all look just the same.

And the people in houses
who went to the university,
where they were put in boxes,
And they all came out the same.
There's doctors and lawyers
And business executives,
They're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the same.

And they all play on the golf-course,
And drink their Martini dry,
And they all have pretty children,
And the children go to school.
And the children go to summer camp
And then to the university,
They all get put in boxes
And they all come out the same.

And the boys go into business,
And marry, raise a family,
And they all get put in boxes,
Little boxes, all the same.
Yeah a green one and a pink one
And a blue one and a yellow one
And they're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the same.

It is Reynolds who enchants us about the absurdity of suburban life and the boring monoculture it creates. Anthropologist Gary Snyder explains in The Practice of the Wild what commons are and why they are so essential for the integrity of the planet and our own soul:

The commons have been defined as “the undivided land belonging to the members of a local community as a whole.” This definition fails to make the point that the commons is both specific land and the traditional community institution that determines the carrying capacity of its various subunits and defines the rights and obligations of those who use it, with penalties for lapses. Because it is traditional and local, it is not identical with today’s “public domain,” which is land held and managed by a central government.

The commons is the contract a people make with their local natural system. The word has an instructive history: it is formed of ko, “together,” with (Greek) moin, “held in common.” But the Indo-European root mei means basically to “move, to go, to change.” This had an archaic special meaning of “exchange of goods and services within a society as regulated by custom or law.” I think it might well refer back to the principle of gift economies: “the gift must always move.” The root comes into Latin as munus, “service performed for the community” and hence “municipality.”

Glanzstoff - Rayon Manufacturing Company
 
For the past two decades, I have spent my time in Austria mostly as tourist and was always amazed by its natural beauty. Quite often I asked myself, why I had traded it with heavily polluted and overpopulated Shanghai. Our recent neighborhood walks reveal though a different reality which goes unnoticed to the vagrant traveler: solid waste pollution is a growing problem. Pedestrians, cyclists and above all drivers litter wildly across the city whenever they are not in public view – a behavior which in my observation confirms that the property system disconnects inhabitants of an ecosystem from the moral responsibility to care for it. Spotless and meticulously designed front yards are in stark contrast to the “public domain” which is treated like an infinite garbage can.

We have chosen the surroundings of a seriously littered former manufacturing site for textile fibers in alignment with our concept of environmental stewardship over commons. Glanzstoff Fabrik literally translates into brilliant fiber manufacturing company. It was up till 2015 a chemical producer of rayon, i.e. an artificial fiber which imitates the feel and texture of natural fibers such as silk, wool, cotton, and linen. As part of the United Rayon Factories is was occasionally in its more than one hundred yearlong operation the world’s second largest producer of rayon. Again, a connection to China, where most of the world’s fiber production has moved to. The process involves carbon sulfide which gave STP for decades the odor of rotten eggs. STP lost with the company a few hundred jobs but gained enormously in terms of living standard and treats its residents since then to a daily breeze of fresh Alpine air.
 
The Glanzstoff factory is now defunct and with its closing an ecosystem which lasted for more than a century collapsed. Despite the environmental burden which the operations put on the city and which were largely removed with national tax money in recent years, one needs to respect that the company created jobs and economic growth in the region. It showed responsibility for its workforce and financed community services, which included then state of the art residential buildings and a football club. A retired Glanzstoff employee who still lives in his old apartment told me that all the apartments had their own allotment garden. He praised the work ethic among his colleagues and lamented that things have changed a lot since the property is exploited to generate rental revenue.  

A property management company has taken over and different scenarios have been sketched out to develop the plot into a modern residential neighborhood, but not much has been put into reality since the year 2009. Existing and new buildings are mostly let to different institutes of the nearby University of Applied Studies. Its very unlikely that the above master plan will ever materialize – and that’s probably good news for this part of the city, because one of the last – potential – commons of Northern STP would thereby be destroyed. On my regular stroll around the former manufacturing site I observe not only litter, but also deer, rabbits, beavers, waterfowl and a riverside woodland, which is in dear need of protection.  

Limits to Corporate Property
 
One can learn from China a great many things and use different ways of handling matters as an alternative to what we are used to. If corporations buy land in China, their deed is limited to 50 years and to the duration of business operation. Such a limitation of property rights might seem inconsolable with our Western understanding of exclusivity but applied on the case of the brilliant fiber manufacturing company, I think it’s a better model than the one we practice so far.
 
The original land-owning purpose of manufacturing fiber has been abandoned. More than a century has passed, and the situation of the plot and the needs of the surrounding community have changed. The new landlord has stopped to deal responsibly with the land he has purchased from a larger community, i.e. in the case of Glanzstoff the city of STP. Legal provisions should make it possible to take back what is not managed properly. The wild littering in the Glanzstoff area and a recent apartment complex which has been erected on a plot which was covered with old trees are proof of such an irresponsible attitude. The capitalist exploitation of the neighborhood is well known in the city government, but nobody dares to speak up and touch upon the sacred lamb of exclusive property rights.

The Western legal system intervenes substantially if parents do not provide for their offspring in a socially responsible way. In addition to criminal penalties, a person who is found guilty of domestic abuse may also face other legal consequences, such as:

• Damages: The defendant may have to pay monetary damages to cover the financial losses of the victim (such as hospital bills or pain and suffering)
• Restraining orders: A judge can issue a domestic abuse injunction such as a temporary or permanent restraining order. These can require the defendant to stay a certain distance from the victim, and can prohibit communication with the victim
• Rehabilitation courses: A judge can also require the defendant to attend mandatory rehabilitation courses, such as anger management classes
• Custodial rights: The defendant may lose their rights to child custody and visitation. This is true even if the charges involved spousal abuse, since courts aim to protect children from being exposed to violence

Somehow, our environmental laws have not caught up with the dire situation of the planet. As parents do not own their children, so do landlords not own a piece of the planet. We are gifted with our children and are asked to unfold their potential. Similarly, the stewardship over land is bestowed upon us in order to preserve its fertility or restore its integrity.  A landlord who abuses his stewardship should

• lose his rights to use or exploit the land (withdraw ownership)
• pay monetary damages to cover the investments necessary to restore the integrity of the ecosystem (indemnify)
• attend mandatory rehabilitation courses about mindful land use and corporate social and environmental responsibility (rehabilitate).
  

Join our next event on January 10th, 2pm

Plastic Pirates is an event that Green Steps originally developed in Shanghai. Many organizations collect rubbish and thereby contribute to the restoration of an intact nature. Green Steps has developed this format especially for children aged 3-12. We let children learn in a playful way how to collect and separate rubbish - and how to do your part from an early age for healthy commons. Join our next event in St. Poelten on January 10, 2pm or  every 2nd Sunday of the month.